Shell imagine the future scenarios competition announces winner from regional competition The world as they see it: Youths present how they envision 2050
Aug 13, 2020
Good Night Consulting Team from Thammasat University wins the first runner up prize from regional competition
IMAGINE THE FUTURE SCENARIO COMPETITION
Bangkok, Thailand – The future is uncertain, but the issues we face today can give rise to a range of alternative futures that could impact how people live, work and play 30 years from now.
Contemplating on these plausible scenarios, 432 students forming 83 teams from Singapore, Egypt and Thailand put forward their alternative views of the future at Shell’s Imagine the Future Scenarios Competition. Shell, a pioneer in the use of scenarios with 50 years of experience, taps onto this skill to enable youths to stretch their thinking and imagination to address our energy challenges. These scenarios also take into account other driving forces, from human behaviour towards the environment and conservation, the globalised and liberal adoption of technology, to regional cooperation and socio-political ideology – to explore alternative views of the future and the potential challenges that come with it.
Based on the topic of ‘More and Cleaner Energy in an Asia Pacific or Middle Eastern city in 2050 – How will residents live, work, and play?’, the finalist teams from Singapore, Egypt and Thailand presented their contrasting possibilities for the future at the regional finals of the competition (11 Aug), after besting others at the national level in their respective countries. The Singapore team from Nanyang Technological University presenting Koshi vs Banbo emerged as the regional winner of this year’s Imagine the Future Scenarios Competition.
“Our congratulations to the winning team from Singapore and we are also very proud of the Thailand team. I hope the Thai team will be making the best use of the good friendship and the invaluable experience from the competition to explore ways to increase awareness about Energy Transition to the greater public for our sustainable future,” said Panun Prachuabmoh, Country Chairman, The Shell Company of Thailand Limited.
“We are very pleased for the Singapore team. Though we were not the winner this time, we were proud to be part of this competition. The Imagine the Future Competition has helped widen our perspective not only about the importance of energy but also of how to create and develop our ideas through exhaustive scenarios. We gained invaluable knowledge learning about great teamwork and working with all the experienced people from Shell. These are important skills for us in both our daily and working lives,” added the Good Night Consulting Team from the Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Thammasat University.
“Shell Scenarios is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year. Over the decades, we have seen the importance of scenario planning in policy making, urban design and city planning. This tool helps private and public sectors explore and anticipate alternative futures. Indeed, scenarios are meant to challenge our thinking processes and stretch the boundaries of what might or might not be possible in future. But more urgently, the discipline of scenarios thinking forces us to consider what needs to be done in the present to successfully navigate the future,” said Dr Valery Chow, Senior Advisor and Head of Judges of Imagine the Future APAC & Middle East Scenarios Competition.
For photos, please visit https://www.facebook.com/imaginethefuturecompetition
2050 through the eyes of the younger generation
Honeybee vs Lazy Sloth, by Thammasat University, Thailand
Focusing on the environment, the Thailand team weighed how natural disasters could drastically impact society, human behaviour and technology. In “Honeybee”, natural disasters become commonplace and this turbulence unites people as they recognise the importance of conservation to protect societal health and wellbeing. While some industries such as insurance will grow in response, other such as infrastructure will need to be redesigned.
On the other hand, in the “Lazy Sloth” scenario where natural disasters are a rarity, people tend to be individualistic. The economy is also able to focus on the growth of the economy and technology as it paves the way for more efficient production of goods and services.
Koshi vs Banbo by Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
With technology adoption as the main variable, the Singapore team explored two distinct storylines that could play out in Tokyo, Japan. The selection of Tokyo mirrors the modern universal issues that the developed world is currently facing, such as an ageing society, increasing land constraints, and income inequality.
The first, “Koshi” (広至), which translates to a vast expanse in Japanese, paints the picture of an integrated world where a globalised and extremely liberal outlook towards technology has resulted in its widespread dominance. For example, fully automated self-driving cars, floating cities, plant-based diets, genetic editing, and weather control are the technological advances that impact residents’ lifestyles in the “Koshi” world.
The second, “Banbo” (万保), which means greater security, presents an opposite world where nationalistic and conservative mindsets have led people to be guarded against external forces. The adoption of technology takes on a different direction here. People use predictive simulations such as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) to balance out energy needs and global climate needs to ensure the safe use and optimsation of technology, prior to its implementation.
A Diamond in the Rough vs For Mother Africa! by University of Science and Technology at Zewail City, Egypt
With African regional cooperation and socio-political ideology as the key driving forces, the Egypt team presented two contrasting scenarios revolving around these concepts. In “A Diamond in the Rough”, the Egyptian city of Aswan is marked by minimal regional cooperation and conservative socio-political ideology. At the same time, it shifts the city towards self-sufficiency and to explore sustainable and even controversial agricultural methods such as hydroponic agriculture, insect farming, and genetic modification.
On the contrary, Aswan in the “For Mother Africa!” scenario is characterised by optimal regional cooperation and progressive socio-political ideology that promotes mutual relationships on economic and cultural fronts. In this scenario, Aswan emerges as a multi-cultural trade centre that serves as a gateway to the continent and an assembly point that connects the region.
For Media Enquiries:
Country External Relations Manager
The Shell Company of Thailand Ltd
T: +66 (0) 2 262 7839
H+K Strategies Thailand
M +66 (0) 2-627-3501 #127
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this press release “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this press release refer to entities over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Entities and unincorporated arrangements over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and “joint operations”, respectively. Entities over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement, after exclusion of all third-party interest.
This press release contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”, “ambition”, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this press release, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; (m) risks associated with the impact of pandemics, such as the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak; and (n) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2020 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this press release and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this press release, August 12, 2020. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.
We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this press release that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.